Ég hef eiginlega fylgst með kosningavökum frá 1967 – já, 8 ára – og sat auðvitað oftast heima í Víðihvammi og horfði með fjölskyldunni. 1978 minnir mig að ég hafi að hluta til farið á flakk til nokkurra menntaskólavina, 1979 var ég í framboði fyrir Sólskinsflokkinnn og minnir að ég hafi verið heima og/eða á einhverju flakki. 1982 sat ég með Höskuldi yfir grilluðum kótilettum fram eftir nóttu. Ég man ekki nákvæmlega eftir kosningavökunni 1983, en frá 1986-2010 var ég oftast í útsendingu, ýmist bara fyrir Rúv eða bæði fyrir Rúv og Stöð2. Ein undantekning var þó 1995, þá var ég ekki að vinna og við fórum út að borða með Brynju & Sverri og svo í eitthvert samkvæmi með þeim á eftir. 2013 buðum við Höskuldi & Sirrý í mat til Krissa & Rúnu (!) og fylgdumst með eitthvað fram eftir. 2014 vorum við í Maastricht og náðum ekki að fylgjast með útsendingunnni vegna þess að vefir fréttastofanna voru ekki að virka. 2016 mættum við á kosningavöku Pírata þannig að í kvöld er ég í fyrsta skipti síðan 1983 að fylgjast með kosningavökunni heima…. nema auðvitað að við æsum okkur á kosningavöku Pírata – í öllu falli náum við fyrstu tölum heima.
Perhaps there is an easy way to get Trump out of office.
Somehow the attention is not so much on his racist executive orders, the morons he is appointing in key positions, the tax cuts for the filthy rich, the health care hazards, deals with regimes that violate human rights or the cuts to science, only his incompetence trying to revoke healthcare gets some attention.
The attention seems to focus on his random and clumsy insults, non-words, making an ass of himself on video tweets, self-pitying rants, who wants to hold his hand (and who doesn’t), who shakes his hands and how.
Remember this is a guy who made “reality” TV shows featuring himself as a tough business man, when reality suggests that he was an incompetent wimp playing away daddy’s money.
As the presidency increasingly looks like a cheap reality show, perhaps the most effective way is stop watching and stop paying attention to his stupid tweets and speeches. He probably is not looking for power and surely he as no interest in “making America great again” – never sure whether he intended to make El Salvador, Chile, Argentina or Canada great again, or that he doesn’t know that there are more countries in America than the US.
But, perhaps, as soon as he doesn’t get attention he will probably lose interest and walk away like a three-year-old in a tantrum that nobody notices.
Let him fire himself.
Probably the most misguided rule in football are the caution / booking (yellow card) and sending off (red card).
Although it is necessary to have measures to deal with unacceptable / dangerous behaviour on the field the methods currently available only serve their purpose in a limited manner.
First there is the booking where a player is shown a yellow card. In many cases after injuring an opponent or robbing the opposing team of half chance or goal scoring opportunity. This has little effect on the player concerned and the team he has offended against gain nothing. Perhaps after a few such incidents, another team benefits.
The second is the sending off or red card. This can drastically change a game, especially early on and can be applied with little intent, for example by a goalkeeper being late for a challenge. Many games have simply been ruined by such incidents, the European Champions League final in 2006 between Arsenal and Barcelona being an example.
It also means that referees can be reluctant to produce a red card, knowing it will change the match dramatically. An example that comes to mind is the 2010 World Cup final between Holland and Spain.
A better way can be found in other similar sports, team handball for example.
These rules could be applied to football so that a yellow cards should include 5 minutes off the field where a team has to play with reduced number of players. After that, the player can be introduced back on the field.
And similarly, a red card would mean 15 minutes suspension where the player’s team plays with fewer players, but after that a substitute can replace the red-carded player.
In extreme cases, for excessive violence, a no-substitutable red card could be used, but this should be rare enough to happen only once in two or three seasons for all teams and leagues.
I was practically forced to move to a Windows 7 phone a year ago, as my company changed an Exchange host and my BlackBerry was no longer an option.
At first it was awful, no Icelandic characters, no copy / paste. Then Mango came along with some improvement.
My phone is an LG, probably with a better screen and keyboard then most, but again it seems that Nokia have added a few features.
What makes the Windows 7 Phone frustrating are, at least, the following issues. Perhaps version 8 has some improvement, but there is a lot to be done before Windows is practical on a phone.
So what are the problems I am hoping will be fixed?
Here are a few examples:
- It is impossible to group apps, they are either pinned to the start page or alphabetalized. No arranging, sub folders or groups.
- My BlackBerry would light a small red LED light when I have a message, No bugging sound and no need to constantly open my phone to check for messages.
- There is no way to copy regular files, you need to use e-mail or SkyDrive or an 3rd party app.
- You cannot copy/paste (or directly) call a number from a message, or other applications.
- Zune only syncs predefined document types.
- The back button is like an eccentric cat, you never know what it brings up. Sometimes is backs within an application, sometimes it switches application.
- Messages cannot be zoomed in (or out).
- Making a phone call takes too many steps.
- When you turn on the phone the screen saver jumps up partly and back down. Three times. This design team must have been up very late at night.
- The keyboard is of course far slower than a real keyboard.
- The screen goes blank during a call.
- There is no way to use a presentable e-mail signature, no font changes, not to mention small graphics. Another probably-very-very-late-at-night design decision to default to “Sent from my ..”. Who really thought that it was important for the receiver of a message to know what equipment was used to send the message?
- IE favourites are too far-fetched.
- Flash pages are not available, but I guess that can be forgiven.
- Occasionally a single page is stuck as my “default” page in IE.
- Notes from Outlook are not accessible.
- Only basic tasks from Outlook are accessible.
- The maps have a problem with locarl characters, making local addresses almost impossible.
- No, or poor, Google Maps access.
- Multitasking is incomprehensible. Sometimes apps seem to be sitting in the background, draining my battery, when I thought I had turned it off.
- SugarSync is not available. All right, not Microsoft’s or LG’s fault.
- Most icons are small, and no help available.
- As the number of applications grow, an alphabetical grouping appears. And this feature is turned on without asking me if I want this. And once in, there is no way to get rid of it.
- You cannot see the total length of a phone call.
- You cannot group phone calls into threads.
- If I miss a phone call from a person with more than one of home, work and or mobile number – it does not suggest to call the number last call. I have to guess (or read a small print before returning the call).
- The system is constantly rearranging my main menu. Without asking. Adding shortcut and deleting as well. I asked about this and was told that my only option was to return to factory settings, losing all my data.
- You cannot send contact information / card.
- You cannot correct one single character in a message. I do understand Nokia has fixed this.
- You cannot store locations in the map system.
- You cannot prepare your travel from your laptop / home computer and access places in maps.
- A document received by e-mail cannot be edited.
- When I connect my phone to charge it plays an annoying tune.
I have a feeling that the whole thing is designed for people who actually like the “cute” search puppy in Windows
I have never understood the arguments against using video replays to assist the referee in the European Cup, World Cup or any other major tournament.
Perhaps because the arguements against this additional technology do not really “hold water”.
The arguments against video replays are mainly (a) it is wrong to change the game and (b) that the game should be the same all over the world.
Let’s have a closer look.
(a) “It is wrong to change the game” fallacy:
- Video replays do not change the game in any way, the rules are the same, it is only to help the judges to enforce the rules. The referee occasionaly consults his assistant referees and the referee should have the option of consulting the fourth official which could have the aid of TV replay.
- Secondly, the game has often been changed. Remember the offside rule, the interpretation of hand-to-ball, passing the ball back to the goalkeeper? The ball is changed without notice and rules for substitution has been changed as well quite frequently. And the firth official was introduced only a few years ago. And now two more.
(B) “The game should be the same everywhere” fallacy:
- There’s more at stake than the major tournament than in junior leagues, it is watched world wide, the game is faster and harder to referee.
- There are a lot of things that are different at different stages of playing football. Just take the ball for an example. Or, again, the fourth referee. The two extra referees. In junior leagues the referees do not communicate through radio. Talk about using technology for the referees.
Using video replays would have help avoid the embarrassment of adding sixty-two end-line officials to the Euro 2012 – only to fail when needed.
– originally posted after England – Ukraina match
As the saying goes, lottery and gambling is just taxation on people who cannot do simple math. Fine, I admit that I sometimes play, but only for small sums, knowing that I probably will lose and realising this is a small price to pay for entertainment.
There is another heavy tax on the naive and gullible. The booming homeopathic, detox, supernatural, miraculous, psychic, spiritual remedies, you-name-it industry. They all have one thing in common, people pay good money for something that no one has been able to proof that works.
If it cannot be demonstrated by objective experiment that something does work, the most likely explanation is that it simply doesn’t.